<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: There&#8217;s More to a Tweetheart.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thedigitalroyalty.com/2010/theres-more-to-a-tweetheart/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thedigitalroyalty.com/2010/theres-more-to-a-tweetheart/</link>
	<description>develop digital integration and social media strategies for corporate and entertainment brands, professional athletes, sports teams and leagues</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 08:38:45 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: I wanna work for a rockstar. &#8211; Kristin Anne Media</title>
		<link>http://www.thedigitalroyalty.com/2010/theres-more-to-a-tweetheart/comment-page-1/#comment-49</link>
		<dc:creator>I wanna work for a rockstar. &#8211; Kristin Anne Media</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 14:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedigitalroyalty.com/?p=414#comment-49</guid>
		<description>[...] name/twitter handle &#8211; Digital Royalty.  She is an original social media rockstar (or as Vanity Fair cutely labeled her a &#8220;Tweetheart&#8221;).  One of her claims to fame is getting Shaquille [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] name/twitter handle &#8211; Digital Royalty.  She is an original social media rockstar (or as Vanity Fair cutely labeled her a &#8220;Tweetheart&#8221;).  One of her claims to fame is getting Shaquille [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vanity Fair, &#8220;Disappointment,&#8221; &#38; Women on Twitter</title>
		<link>http://www.thedigitalroyalty.com/2010/theres-more-to-a-tweetheart/comment-page-1/#comment-48</link>
		<dc:creator>Vanity Fair, &#8220;Disappointment,&#8221; &#38; Women on Twitter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 17:05:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedigitalroyalty.com/?p=414#comment-48</guid>
		<description>[...] There&#8217;s More to a Tweetheart by Amy Jo Martin on thedigitalroyalty.com [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] There&#8217;s More to a Tweetheart by Amy Jo Martin on thedigitalroyalty.com [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin2</title>
		<link>http://www.thedigitalroyalty.com/2010/theres-more-to-a-tweetheart/comment-page-1/#comment-44</link>
		<dc:creator>admin2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 15:56:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedigitalroyalty.com/?p=414#comment-44</guid>
		<description>Thank you all for the feedback. I appreciate hearing all POVs. Hope you enjoy your favorite magazines on the new Apple iTablet or Kindle or . . . 

Best~
Amy</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you all for the feedback. I appreciate hearing all POVs. Hope you enjoy your favorite magazines on the new Apple iTablet or Kindle or . . . </p>
<p>Best~<br />
Amy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kim</title>
		<link>http://www.thedigitalroyalty.com/2010/theres-more-to-a-tweetheart/comment-page-1/#comment-41</link>
		<dc:creator>Kim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jan 2010 18:55:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedigitalroyalty.com/?p=414#comment-41</guid>
		<description>Very well said! I commend you for taking the classy route while making sure people also get to hear your side of the story. I&#039;m sure the author of that VF article will soon be eating their words.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very well said! I commend you for taking the classy route while making sure people also get to hear your side of the story. I&#8217;m sure the author of that VF article will soon be eating their words.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Me</title>
		<link>http://www.thedigitalroyalty.com/2010/theres-more-to-a-tweetheart/comment-page-1/#comment-36</link>
		<dc:creator>Me</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 23:12:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedigitalroyalty.com/?p=414#comment-36</guid>
		<description>Good points, I think I will definitely subscribe! I&#039;ll go and read some more! What do you see the future of this being?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good points, I think I will definitely subscribe! I&#8217;ll go and read some more! What do you see the future of this being?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: @your_mssunshine</title>
		<link>http://www.thedigitalroyalty.com/2010/theres-more-to-a-tweetheart/comment-page-1/#comment-34</link>
		<dc:creator>@your_mssunshine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 03:13:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedigitalroyalty.com/?p=414#comment-34</guid>
		<description>Real is always classy.  I&#039;ve been watching @PRsarahevans for years.  She is nothing but real, fat-hearted and all muscle when it comes to the heavy lifting. Would place my bets on you and other tweethearts, too.  Shine on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Real is always classy.  I&#8217;ve been watching @PRsarahevans for years.  She is nothing but real, fat-hearted and all muscle when it comes to the heavy lifting. Would place my bets on you and other tweethearts, too.  Shine on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karen</title>
		<link>http://www.thedigitalroyalty.com/2010/theres-more-to-a-tweetheart/comment-page-1/#comment-33</link>
		<dc:creator>Karen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 08:24:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedigitalroyalty.com/?p=414#comment-33</guid>
		<description>That article reeked of poor research. Bummers. Hopefully they do a redemptive follow-up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That article reeked of poor research. Bummers. Hopefully they do a redemptive follow-up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: OMG, there’s more to twitter then you see : Artiatesia Deal</title>
		<link>http://www.thedigitalroyalty.com/2010/theres-more-to-a-tweetheart/comment-page-1/#comment-32</link>
		<dc:creator>OMG, there’s more to twitter then you see : Artiatesia Deal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 19:19:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedigitalroyalty.com/?p=414#comment-32</guid>
		<description>[...] Read the opinions of others here: Vanity Fair Unfair to Twitter? Vanity Fair on Twitter fame: Twembarrassing Hot For Twitter! Vanity Fair’s “Twilebrities” Have Sexy Legs Twinternet Tweaks Out over Vanity Fair Twilebrity Story There’s More to a Tweetheart. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Read the opinions of others here: Vanity Fair Unfair to Twitter? Vanity Fair on Twitter fame: Twembarrassing Hot For Twitter! Vanity Fair’s “Twilebrities” Have Sexy Legs Twinternet Tweaks Out over Vanity Fair Twilebrity Story There’s More to a Tweetheart. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: worldofhiglet</title>
		<link>http://www.thedigitalroyalty.com/2010/theres-more-to-a-tweetheart/comment-page-1/#comment-30</link>
		<dc:creator>worldofhiglet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Jan 2010 01:20:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedigitalroyalty.com/?p=414#comment-30</guid>
		<description>Thank you for stating what should be obvious - the Vanity Fair was a missed opportunity for everyone involved, although VF will probably be more than happy since there is no such thing as bad publicity.

The fact that you had a two hour interview for this article is incredible - why did they even bother?

The only upside is that people saw through it so quickly and have called it out for what it is. I hope you can all take comfort from that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for stating what should be obvious &#8211; the Vanity Fair was a missed opportunity for everyone involved, although VF will probably be more than happy since there is no such thing as bad publicity.</p>
<p>The fact that you had a two hour interview for this article is incredible &#8211; why did they even bother?</p>
<p>The only upside is that people saw through it so quickly and have called it out for what it is. I hope you can all take comfort from that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: olivier blanchard</title>
		<link>http://www.thedigitalroyalty.com/2010/theres-more-to-a-tweetheart/comment-page-1/#comment-29</link>
		<dc:creator>olivier blanchard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jan 2010 19:55:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedigitalroyalty.com/?p=414#comment-29</guid>
		<description>Well stated. Tip of the hat to you for writing this, Amy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well stated. Tip of the hat to you for writing this, Amy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
